The United States and Iran are trading blows again

Tetha Joselyne MUGABIRWA
4 Min Read

The United States and Iran have exchanged fire again just days after observing a ceasefire, raising concerns that the truce the two sides agreed to last month may fail to deliver the lasting peace that had been hoped for.

On July 8, 2026, the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) announced that it had carried out a major airstrike on Iranian military positions in the southern part of the country.

According to the United States, the strike was a swift response to Iranian attacks on July 7 targeting three commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

In retaliation, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announced that its naval and air forces had launched attacks on 85 key U.S. military installations in Bahrain and Kuwait.

The two sides have described these attacks as acts of provocation and retaliation, stemming from their longstanding dispute over the control and security of the Persian Gulf.

On June 24, the Government of Oman and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) announced the establishment of a temporary maritime corridor along Oman’s coast, protected by the United States, to help guide commercial vessels that had become stranded.

The Iranian government immediately condemned the decision, arguing that it had been made without consultation with countries in the region. Tehran also warned that any vessel using the corridor would be required to obtain authorization from Iran.

Following the warning, two ships proceeded through the corridor. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attacked the vessels, prompting the IMO to suspend all rescue operations in the area.

During the night of June 26–27, the United States launched strikes on Iranian military positions in southern Iran in retaliation for the attacks on the ships. Iran responded by targeting U.S. military installations in Bahrain and Kuwait.

On June 28, the United States and Iran agreed to a ceasefire in order to continue negotiations aimed at reaching a permanent peace agreement.

On July 7, Iranian forces attacked three commercial vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz, prompting the United States to launch strikes on Iranian military positions.

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) stated that its operation was a powerful response intended to make Iran “pay a heavy price” for attacking the vessels, which it said were carrying “innocent civilians in international waters.”

The U.S. military accused Iran of engaging in provocative actions that undermine the ceasefire agreement the two sides had reached while working toward a broader framework to end the conflict.

Meanwhile, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said its strikes on U.S. military installations were retaliation against Washington for “violating the ceasefire agreement and the preliminary accord,” which Pakistan had played a major role in facilitating.

The IRGC also claimed that the United States carried out the strikes while Iran was preparing for the funeral of its former Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, arguing that Washington intended to disrupt the ceremony.

The Iranian government further maintains that the preliminary agreement reached with the United States last month grants Tehran the exclusive authority and responsibility to protect and regulate all vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

The United States, however, maintains that the agreement requires Iran to allow all vessels to transit the Strait of Hormuz freely, safely, and without charge.

As international organizations express growing concern over the safety of civilians navigating these waters, analysts warn that unless urgent action is taken, the renewed exchanges could escalate into a full-scale and prolonged conflict across the region.

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *